<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.3/JATS-archivearticle1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vostokoriens</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Восток (Oriens)</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vostok (Oriens)</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0869-1908</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2713-0401</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Институт востоковедения РАН</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1391</article-id><title-group><article-title>ДЕТИ, СОЛОМЕННЫЕ СОБАКИ И МЕЛКАЯ РЫБЕШКА: НАРОД И ЕГО МЕСТО В ИДЕАЛЬНОМ ГОСУДАРСТВЕ ЛАО-ЦЗЫ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>OTILDREN, STRAW DOGS AND SMALL FISH: THE IMAGE OF PEOPLE AND THE POLITICAL IDEAL OF THE LAOZI</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гомулин</surname><given-names>Андрей Леонидович</given-names></name><string-name xml:lang="en">Andrey Gomulin</string-name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>07</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>75</lpage><self-uri>http://vostokoriens.ru/articles/deti-solomennye-sobaki-i-melkaya-rybeshka-narod-i-ego-mesto-v/</self-uri><self-uri content-type="application/pdf">http://vostokoriens.ru/articles/deti-solomennye-sobaki-i-melkaya-rybeshka-narod-i-ego-mesto-v/pdf/</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье обсуждается природа отношений между правителем и подданными в политической теории Лао-цзы. Основание этих отношений видится в отсутствии у народа любых политических, экономических или нравственных обязательств перед правителем или государством. Это допущение позволяет получить рациональное, а не метафизическое объяснение доктрины идеального поведения правителя у-вэй, или “недеяния”.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The present paper discusses the nature of the relationships between the ruler and the people in the Laozi’s political theory. It maintains that the basic foundation of these relationships is the people’s lack of any political, economic or moral obligations toward the ruler or the state. This assumption has many far-reaching ramifications as to the functioning of the state, as well as to the nature and practical realization of ruler’s power. In particular, it provides a rational rather than metaphysical explanation of the “non-action” wu-wei ideal of ruler’s behavior.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Лао-цзы</kwd><kwd>Дао-дэ цзин</kwd><kwd>политическая теория</kwd><kwd>народ</kwd><kwd>правитель</kwd><kwd>минь бэнь</kwd><kwd>у-вэй</kwd><kwd>анархизм</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Laozi</kwd><kwd>Dao De Jing (Tao Те Ching)</kwd><kwd>political theory</kwd><kwd>people</kwd><kwd>ruler</kwd><kwd>min-ben</kwd><kwd>wu-wei</kwd><kwd>anarchism</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article>