<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.3/JATS-archivearticle1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vostokoriens</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Восток (Oriens)</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vostok (Oriens)</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0869-1908</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2713-0401</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Институт востоковедения РАН</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2356</article-id><title-group><article-title>ЗАПИСКИ Ф.А. ОССЕНДОВСКОГО КАК ИСТОЧНИК ПО ИСТОРИИ МОНГОЛИИ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>ZAPISKI F.A. OSSENDOVSKOGO KAK ISTOChNIK PO ISTORII MONGOLII</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name xml:lang="ru"><surname /></name></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>09</month><year>2008</year></pub-date><issue>5</issue><fpage>97</fpage><lpage>110</lpage><self-uri>http://vostokoriens.ru/articles/zapiski-f-a-ossendovskogo-kak-istochnik-po-istorii-mongolii/</self-uri><self-uri content-type="application/pdf">http://vostokoriens.ru/articles/zapiski-f-a-ossendovskogo-kak-istochnik-po-istorii-mongolii/pdf/</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>ВСТУПИТ. СТАТЬЯ, ПЕРЕВОД С ПОЛЬСК. И КОММ. С. Л. КУЗЬМИНА, Л. Ю. РЕЙТА
We analyze historical reliability of the F.A. Ossendowski book &amp;quot;Beasts, Men and Gods&amp;quot; in the context of new data from archives, memoirs and two unpublished manuscripts by Ossendowski. Data on his contacts with baron R.F. von Ungern-Sternberg, as well as on events in the Western and the Central Mongolia are mainly reliable. Dating from the author&amp;apos;s arrival to Uliassutai to departure from Mongolia is generally correct. Inconsistencies in his famous book are discussed in detail. Following inconsistencies are most important. Ossendowski&amp;apos;s travel to Tibet and his conversations with Bogd-gegeen VI// should be considered as fantasy. Stories on Tushegoun-Lama (Ja-Lama) do not withstand verification. Data on Bogd-gegeen and Buddhism contain significant inconsistencies. Agharti and the King of the World represent Ossendowski&amp;apos;s theosophical treatment of religious stories, mainly on Shambhala. Part of adventures and battles can not be proved but these data have no historical value. Notebook (apparently, the diary) of Ossendowski&amp;apos;s travel in Mongolia, as well as his report on political situation there in March-April 1921 are first published (Russian translation).</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>We analyze historical reliability of the F.A. Ossendowski book &amp;quot;Beasts, Men and Gods&amp;quot; in the context of new data from archives, memoirs and two unpublished manuscripts by Ossendowski. Data on his contacts with baron R.F. von Ungern-Sternberg, as well as on events in the Western and the Central Mongolia are mainly reliable. Dating from the author&amp;apos;s arrival to Uliassutai to departure from Mongolia is generally correct. Inconsistencies in his famous book are discussed in detail. Following inconsistencies are most important. Ossendowski&amp;apos;s travel to Tibet and his conversations with Bogd-gegeen VI// should be considered as fantasy. Stories on Tushegoun-Lama (Ja-Lama) do not withstand verification. Data on Bogd-gegeen and Buddhism contain significant inconsistencies. Agharti and the King of the World represent Ossendowski&amp;apos;s theosophical treatment of religious stories, mainly on Shambhala. Part of adventures and battles can not be proved but these data have no historical value. Notebook (apparently, the diary) of Ossendowski&amp;apos;s travel in Mongolia, as well as his report on political situation there in March-April 1921 are first published (Russian translation).</p></trans-abstract></article-meta></front></article>